Strategic deterrence in a changing environment

Publisher: Gower Pub. Co., Publisher: Allanheld, Osmun in [Farnborough, Eng.], [Montclair, N.J.]

Written in English
Published: Pages: 194 Downloads: 697
Share This


  • United States


  • Deterrence (Strategy).,
  • Strategic forces.,
  • Nuclear weapons.,
  • United States -- Military policy.

Edition Notes

Statementedited by Christoph Bertram.
SeriesThe Adelphi library ; 6, Adelphi library ;, 6.
ContributionsBertram, Christoph, 1937-, International Institute for Strategic Studies.
LC ClassificationsU162.6 .S85 1980
The Physical Object
Paginationvi, 194 p. :
Number of Pages194
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL4121628M
ISBN 100916672751
LC Control Number80067841

The emergence of hypersonic weapons provides a new challenge to strategy and the way we think about deterrence. Russia’s new hypersonic capability demands NATO reconsider its approach to its deterrence and defence posture. This paper argues that hypersonic weapons will change the nature of NATO’s strategic posture.   That is how much it permeated our thinking and how strategic deterrence has been so successful that it has removed that from the way that we even think. I also submit, when I say strategic deterrence did that, that was a lot of work. That was a level of national commitment to a mission that included 4, strategic deterrent patrols. In South Asian Strategic Environment, the key challenge to Deterrence Stability is India’s unstoppable strategic aims to negate the stable situation. the political will can change with the.   The sooner we replace deterrence, signaling, and all the other accoutrements of nuclear strategy as a guide for strategy the better it will be for defending U.S. interests. A version of this paper entitled “Deterrence is Dead” was presented to Department of Defense Strategic .

Weber and Tarba () provided a more extensive review of strategic agility, which they defined as “the ability of management to constantly and rapidly sense and respond to a changing environment by intentionally making strategic moves and consequently adapting the necessary organizational configuration for successful implementation” (p. 7).   Breaking down resolve into the components of stakes, credible capabilities, and risk tolerance helps explain the motivations behind the escalation decisions made in a strategic deterrence wargaming environment. This, in turn, allows researchers to apply lessons to better understand the dynamics of real-world strategic challenges. An examination of IDF deterrence capacity in the wake of military campaigns against Hamas and Hezbollah reveals a mixed record where tactical successes have not translated into strategic victories. While deterrence in a non-nuclear context is a developing field in International Relations theory, its basic tenets have been utilized since the.   The changing nature of the DPRK’s capabilities and strategic stance dictates a need to re-calibrate the collective defenses of the US and its regional allies. Henceforth, it is important not only to integrate cyber and traditional military forces on the operational level, but also to bridge the gap between the communities of defense policy.

Geostrategy, a subfield of geopolitics, is a type of foreign policy guided principally by geographical factors as they inform, constrain, or affect political and military planning. As with all strategies, geostrategy is concerned with matching means to ends —in this case, a country's resources (whether they are limited or extensive) with its geopolitical objectives (which can be local.   Deterrence could break down owing to either strategic or tactical miscalculation. The upshot of the developments is dangerous new uncertainty about the U.S. ability to check various Chinese moves, which could invite risk-taking by Chinese leaders. Deterrence could break down owing to either strategic or tactical miscalculation.

Strategic deterrence in a changing environment Download PDF EPUB FB2

ISBN: OCLC Number: Notes: "Published for the International Institute for Strategic Studies.". Strategic Management Accounting: Delivering Value in a Changing Business Environment Through Integrated Reporting Paperback – Janu by Sean Stein Smith (Author) See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions.

Price New from Used from Kindle "Please retry" $ — — Paperback "Please retry" $Author: Sean Stein Smith. It has been replaced by a new global security environment in which the central role of deterrence, both nuclear and otherwise, appears to have diminished.

The Cold War has been succeeded by a new state of play. This book will be of interest to students of Cited by: 1. Strategic Deterrence in a Changing Environment (The Adelphi library ; 6) Want to read 33 Currently reading; Published June by Rowman & Littlefield Pub Inc. Written in English Subjects: War And Peace, Military Policy, Central government policies, Defence strategy, planning & research, International relations.

Deterrence and Asymmetry: Non-State Actors and Mass Casualty Terrorism 5. The New Indeterminacy of Deterrence and Missile Defence 6. United States Nuclear Strategy in the Twenty First Century 7.

A Few Speculations on Russia's Deterrence Policy 8. Redefining Strategic Stability in a Changing World: A Chinese View 9. Author: National Research Council Publisher: National Academies Press ISBN: X Size: MB Format: PDF, Kindle View: Get Books Changes in the 21st century security environment require new analytic approaches to support strategic deterrence.

User Review - Flag as inappropriate In Deterrence and Security in the 21st Century, Avery Goldstein successfully uses the neorealist, balance-of-power theory and strategic studies to explore the motivations of countries considered second-rate during the Cold War to create their own strategy for self-protection, in spite of being under the protection of a superpower ally.4/5(3).

ever complex and volatile security environment. The deterrence research task force works closely with the Air Force Global Strike Command to address strategic policy and operational issues, and to offer a launching point for a broader discourse on strategic deterrence, both within and without the command.

In Academic Year. sion in our strategic deterrent capabilities well documented in a number of reports.7 In spite of the rhetoric Strategic deterrence in a changing environment book the past two Nuclear Posture Reviews and the National Strategic deterrence in a changing environment book Strategy, there has been a paucity of thinking by senior-level decision-makers about the role of our strategic deterrent, and particularly the role of nuclear weap.

In this book, Thérèse Delpech calls for a renewed intellectual effort to address the relevance of the traditional concepts of first strike, escalation, extended deterrence, and other Cold War–era strategies in today's complex world of additional superpowers (e.g., China), smaller nuclear powers (e.g., Pakistan and North Korea), and nonstate actors (e.g., terrorists), as well as the.

The US National Security Strategy states “The new strategic environment requires new approaches to deterrence and defense.

Our deterrence strategy no longer rests primarily on the grim premise of inflicting devastating consequences on potential foes.

Changes in the 21st century security environment require new analytic approaches to support strategic deterrence. Because current adversaries may be deterred from the use of nuclear weapons differently than were Cold War adversaries, the Air Force needs an analytic process and tools that can help determine those Air Force capabilities that will successfully deter or defeat these new nuclear Author: National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Air Force Studies Board.

The book is structured to perform a role both as a primer to those who wish to understand the strategic issues and key concepts in cyberspace, as well as to provide sufficient pointers to those. Adapting deterrence strategies to a changing security environment Wednesday 20 – Saturday 23 June | WP Annotated bibliography Jacek Durkalec, Lesley Kucharski, Rafael Loss, Andrew Reddie, Brad Roberts Key questions posed for the workshop: 1.

In that case, deterrence will continue to be an indispensable element of national strategy to ensure that conflict does not take its most violent, destructive forms. General Habiger is the Commander-in-Chief of the U.S.

Strategic Command. This paper is the result of a speech delivered to the Atlantic Council on February 10th in Washington, D.C. Strategic Deterrence: Past, Current, and Future. PANEL ON DETERRENCE CONCEPT UPDATES AND APPROACHES. Michael Wheeler, senior research staff, Institute for Defense Analyses, led the panel titled “Deterrence Concept Updates and Approaches” at the first workshop session.

Changes in the 21st century security environment require new analytic approaches to support strategic deterrence. Because current adversaries may be deterred from the use of nuclear weapons differently than were Cold War adversaries, the Air Force needs an analytic process and tools that can help determine those Air Force capabilities that will successfully deter or defeat these new nuclear.

strategic nuclear weapons can be considered unnecessary, and, by extension, the sub-strategic weapons stored in Germany (i.e. battlefield ordinance) obsolete. In a strategy of minimal nuclear deterrence, however, the sub-strategic nuclear weapons stationed in Germany and other participants of NATO’s nuclear sharing.

Book Description: Drawing on Chinese military writings, this report finds that China’s strategic-deterrence concepts are evolving in response to Beijing’s changing assessment of its external security environment and a growing emphasis on protecting its emerging interests in space and cyberspace.

U.S. Air Force Strategic Deterrence Analytic Capabilities identifies the broad analytic issues and factors that must be considered in seeking nuclear deterrence of adversaries and assurance of allies in the 21st century.

This report describes and assesses tools, methods - including behavioral science-based methods - and approaches for improving. To catalyze broader national and international thinking about the requirements of effective deterrence, assurance, and strategic stability in a changed and changing security environment.

To assist in the development of new generations of experts motivated by a clear view of the changed and changing security environment. Deterrence operations appear to be an abstract operation for most of us, but its impact generates/prevents/initiates defensive or offensive action by the adversary.

The US National Security Strategy states, “The new strategic environment requires new approaches to deterrence and defense. nature of strategic deterrence and the role of nuclear weapons under strategic deterrence student research papers addressing this question are presented in this book.

1 CHAPTER 1 mission and assesses its continued relevance given the changing geopolitical environment witnessed over the last decade. He finds that tactical nuclear.

You can distil deterrence down to two factors: capability and will—Chris Gibson. In my article “Changing Dynamics of Deterrence in International Security and Strategic Paradigm”, which was Part-1, I explained the enduring and timeless nature of deterrence as a state policy, as also the changes in scope, dimensions and domains, where deterrence is more effective at the strategic and.

deterrence is a response to the changing strategic environment in South Asia, where India is engaged in modernising its conventional and nuclear forces along with developing and procuring its Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) systems, and in formulating offensive war fighting strategies   Gen Kidwai (Retd.) former Strategic Plan Division Head of Pakistan explained the concept of “full-spectrum deterrence” as the Pak mechanism to.

Redefining Strategic Stability in a Changing World: A Chinese View, Zhong Jing and Pan Zhenqiang 9. France, the United Kingdon and Deterrence in the Twenty First Century, John Simpson Positions on Deterrence in a Non-WMD Country: The Case of Germany, Bernd Kubbig Regional Dynamics and Deterrence: South Asia (1), Wahegiru Pal Sindgh Sid.

strategic level national security themes in a rapidly changing, multi-domain global threat environment. Goals» Advance deterrence and assurance thinking beyond Cold War era narratives.» Stimulate rigorous academic research into deterrence, assurance, and other concepts of strategic.

1 Lawrence Freedman, Deterrence (Cambridge: Polity ) pp. 2 Ibid. pp–4. 3 Freedman (note 1) pp.1– 4 Richard Ned Lebow and Janice Gross Stein, We All Lost the Cold War (Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP ) Ch. 5 Ibid. 6 Gordon H. Chang, Friends and Enemies: The United States, China and the Soviet Union, – (Pala Alto, CA: Stanford UP ); Jian Chen, Mao's China.

NATO periodically reviews this mix to assess whether it is “fit for purpose.” Init conducted a full Deterrence and Defense Posture Review and the resulting report conveyed to allied publics the roles of the different instruments of deterrence and the commitment to continue to adapt the deterrent in response to changing circumstances.

Strategic sderzhivanie encompasses the Western concepts of coercive statecraft, deterrence, compellence, and intra-war deterrence. It is a multi-domain, cross-cutting effort to shape the strategic environment to serve Russia’s objectives using a range of both soft and hard power tools of statecraft in peacetime and during conflict.

This book explores evolving patterns of nuclear deterrence, the impact of new technologies, and changing deterrent force postures in the South Asian region to assess future challenges for sustainable peace and stability.

Under the core principles of the security dilemma, this book analyzes the prevailing security environment in South Asia and offers unilateral, bilateral, and .Deterring “Competition Short of War” Robert C.

Jones. Author’s Note: I wrote the following piece in the spring of to help provoke thinking on how the concept of deterrence should evolve in order to stay in step with the rapidly evolving strategic environment. I wrote this in my capacity as the strategic advisor to the Director of Plans, Policy and Strategy at United States Special.